<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Budget SEO Experiment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrishornak.com/no-budget-seo-experiment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrishornak.com/no-budget-seo-experiment/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, Theories and the Science of SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan G.</title>
		<link>http://chrishornak.com/no-budget-seo-experiment/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 21:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrishornak.com/blog/?p=86#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Interesting experiment, in principle. But are you surprised that your site was able to rank, using spammy tactics for a search term that has literally zero competition? On the contrary, I would be pretty surprised if it didn&#039;t rank...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting experiment, in principle. But are you surprised that your site was able to rank, using spammy tactics for a search term that has literally zero competition? On the contrary, I would be pretty surprised if it didn&#8217;t rank&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: chrishornak.com @ 2012-02-03 20:00:40 -->
